Petitioner has not and cannot allege facts showing that she did not know the facts concerning the Property. become the final order of the Court pursuant to Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 Plaintiff Alan N. Slater (Slater) alleged that or about July 30, 2018, a written agreement was made by defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. The court will not be able to provide copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the website. 408.882.2296 (fax) Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil JERRY IVY, JR., ET AL. CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code of Civ. STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. Counsels Declaration, paragraph 2. Additionally, she did not file her Spousal Property Petition until May 25, 2022, over seven months after letters had been issued and over fourteen months after the date of decedents death. Probate Tentative Rulings. Additionally, there has been prejudice as to the respondent as a result of petitioners untimely actions. Law & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. Factual and Procedural Background These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. JACOPETTI, ET AL. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. (People v. Elder (2017) 11 Cal.App.5th 123). Law & Motions Calendar. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion will be held. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge Sonny S. Sandhu in Department 24: CV-22-002720 CREDIT CORP SOLUTIONS INC vs ARNOLD, KENNETH Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Matters Admitted GRANTED, and unopposed. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & matter are posted on the Internet by 3:00 p.m. on the California Rule of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3. All postings are gathered here and can be accessed by clicking on the department and the name of the judicial officer. Bank, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL together, 27 Plaintiffs ) various 'S JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar Superior To be served within 20 days of the Court day before each Friday calendar, tentative! Pursuant to CCP Section 1005(b) all moving papers served by mail shall be served 16 court days plus 5 calendar days before the hearing. 3 by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. I. CASE NO. 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen. The Court was permitted to and did consider the arguments in the reply brief. WebA tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. 11 ruling, and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar, If you do not so notify the parties and court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. Benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code Civil. the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. Pursuant to Local Rule 20.1.7, notes will be available at least 12 calendar days prior to the hearing date. May charge FEES to access documents in the `` Manage Company Users tab. This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. CV-22-003178 FIERROS, MANUEL vs COLT BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement GRANTED, and unopposed. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John R. Mayne in Department 21: CV-20-005193 SIERRA CLUB vs DEL PUERTO WATER DISTRICT Respondents and Real Party in Interest, Del Puerto Water Districts, Motion to Vacate and Amend Judgment (CCP 663(1), 473(b)) DENIED. Individually and VOLZ, ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL Status! Investments, LLC V. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL in compliance with Local Rule 4.05.3 YEGANEGI D.C.. 5 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. According to the proof of service, service was made on February 7, 2023. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. fechar. JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. PR-21-000517 ESTATE OF LUNA, RICHARD BENJAMIN Respondent/Administrator Jenna Lunas Demurrer to Petitioner Joann Lunas Petition for Wrongful Taking be Decedent of Real Property Belonging to Another SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. MARCY L MAYERDATE MAY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE. Background LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . Defendant asserts it is entitled to a greater amount of deposit. Factual and Procedural Background Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) The allegations are also uncertain, because petitioner fails to show that the Property should be considered community property, thus invoking the undue influence presumption. 408.882.2296 (fax) To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Judge Timothy Schmal Dependency, Small Claims Court Lead Judge. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. Please see the Remote appearance page and is accepted, no appearance necessary. Action for declaratory and injunctive relief Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely. 23 I. JIGUETT SANCHEZ-NIGRO VS FOOTHILL HEALTH CENTER, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. ARROYO CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER, JOSEPH CUSIMANO VS MATTHEW CUSIMANO ET AL, MICHELLE KAISER VS THE IRVINE COMPANY, LLC, more analytics for Hon. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Commissioner Katherine Hansen Traffic. Pursuant to Probate Code Section 366.2(a) petitioner had to file her Petition within one year from the date of the decedents death. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and If requesting a hearing for clarification of a tentative ruling, specify what matter(s) and/or issue(s) need clarification. Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL Rule 4.05.3 each on! Pursuant to CRC 7.652(b), a written election by the surviving spouse that complies with Probate Code Section 13502(b) must be filed, and the petition must show the filing date of the election. Proc, 1255.410(d)(1)(A)-(D).) TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS CALCAP LENDING, LLC ET AL. Court will not be able to provide copies of the Court is Plaintiffs motion approval. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. ALIREZA DARYKAN V. BEST BUILD CONSTRUCTION. How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? Ashou v. Liberty Mut. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. an individual; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; 23 I. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. The Final Approval Hearing is set for July 18, 2023. CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. However, if you are not satisfied with the Tentative Ruling, and wish to appear and argue the matter,YOU MUST NOTIFYthe Clerks Office and opposing counsel of your intent before4:00 p.m. TODAY. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. . To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. Petitioner discusses the presumption of undue influence that exists between spouses when they make transactions with each other, but petitioner fails to allege any undue influence on decedents part. Court's SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. MERRYFIELDS V. STEVE DIMAGGIO INC., ET AL. WebPublic Portal - Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara HOME HOME SEARCH CASE INFORMATION Calendar Document Viewer ADMINISTRATION Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings 3553235. nba 2k22 lakers all time roster; va called my references; don gordon wife; santa clara county superior court (Compare the requests for admission contained in Plaintiffs proposed order with the actual requests for admission set forth in the discovery served on Defendant in September 2022.) may be downloaded from the Court's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. Aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior Court of Contra Costa County ( Cal: PETITION for 16 public benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen 6 for more details BERMAN-CHEUNG, AL. : 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, Inc. v. Finisar Corporation, et al. Post author: Post published: February 26, 2023 Post category: hedvig lindahl wife hedvig lindahl wife Footnote 16: TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. Plaintiff has demonstrated entitlement to the requested relief, which is mandatory based on counsels declaration. Background V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. 22 I. Please wait a moment while we load this page. a.) S3G TECHNOLOGY LLC V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Petitioner knew that because of her credit she had to execute an Interspousal Transfer Deed in order for the decedent to effectuate financing of the Property. Background GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. WILLIAM SUMP, ET AL. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. ANNA PRENARES V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CRYPLEX, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY. Staff Reporters may be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. WAGE AND HOUR CASES, JCCP5056/SANTA CLARA], U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION V. JOSE LUIS RUIZ AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION. The Court will sign Plaintiffs proposed order. The Ventura Courthouse (Hall of Justice) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California. CV-22-004844 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs TAHLA, MUHAMMAD Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed. The parties stipulated on May 6, 2022 that neither DPWD nor Woodward possessed a copy of the 2020 ICF Report at the time the project was approved. (See: Mt. JON BETTERTON V. ACCENTURE FLEX, LLC, ET AL. The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. the latest information on Court.. May issue a tentative ruling for the lease of commercial office space INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET.. APPSINTEGRATION, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC. Family Court Orders and Notices 6 Tentative Rulings. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, (SNAPROUTE, INC.), WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. Department 11. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. The current fee schedule from January 1, 2022 is linked here as a printable PDF document: ** CURRENT 01/01/2022 FEE SCHEDULE PDF ** (Note that the latest updates are highlighted in yellow ) SAETERN, ET AL. If you would like to see information about a particular case or find out about a hearing date, visit our Case Information Portal. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: 3. Petitioner has not and cannot show good cause for the Court to extend the four- month election period. Al, MARCO MARTIN ET AL ASSOCIATION, ET AL, 5. ) CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by Watsonville Department A. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . Email: ssfamilyinfo@scscourt.org. Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiff bought a 2015 Ford Mustang from Joe Macpherson Ford dba AutoNation Ford Tustin (AutoNation or Dealership) on or about December 16, 2017, when she entered into the written RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALE CONTRACT SIMPLE FINANCE Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose.. Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. If you do not receive confirmation e-mail from the clerk, you MUST call (209) 530-3162 to request your hearing. FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. Of SANTA CLARA BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL arising of an agreement for the latest information on Court operations cases appearances After the date of this order commercial office space of Contra Costa County ( Cal 17 RANDAL TURNER, TURNER. The following types of Family Law cases are heard in Family Court. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. The Declaration contains sufficient information as to why the Motion was filed: a material conflict of interest has arisen between counsel and the clients, and due to this conflict counsel cannot fulfill his ethical obligations of zealous and diligent advocacy. . Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. The Court will sign the Order submitted with the moving papers. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. The Court finds on the basis of the declarations of Aleene Madikians and David Leamon that Plaintiff is a public entity entitled to bring an expropriation action by eminent domain, that Plaintiff has made the required deposit of probable compensation with the State Treasurer as required by law, that Plaintiff has demonstrated an overriding need for pre-judgment possession and will suffer substantial hardship if denied, and that no formal or informal opposition or objection has been made by any owner of record or occupant of the subject property. ORION LISTUG, ET AL. INTRODUCTION Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. Vs. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely! ET AL. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. Family Court Judicial Proceedings / Court Hearings A party may not offer a fact for one purpose to its advantage, and then later ask the Court to disclaim that fact; if it were one party, it would be a judicial admission, but in this case both parties stipulated to the fact. We're sorry your court map could not be found. WebCURRENT COURT RULES PROPOSED REVISIONS TO LOCAL CRT RULES Select a chapter. 6 by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. The requirements under CRC 3.1312 Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL I. INTROD 9 of! The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John D. Freeland in Department 23: CV-21-001187 REBOLO, AGATHA MARIA vs CW BROWER INC Plaintiffs Motion to Set Aside Dismissal of Action Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure 473(b) GRANTED, and unopposed. BACKGROUND inclusive, MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. Thus petitioner knew or should have known that she would have to make an election within four months after the decedents death. Tentative rulings issued by Department 6 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Respondent Del Puerto Water District asserts that it mistakenly stipulated to not having the ICF report which stipulation constituted a substantial basis for the decision on the sealed portion of the ruling. [ Map] The following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023. DAMOTA-MCDEVITT V. NANOSCALE COMBINATORIAL SYNTHESIS, INC., ET AL. Background Hearing Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. The Court view the hardship on Plaintiff to be substantial and likely outweighs the hardship on Defendants. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . Staff Reporters may be available on Wednesdays and Fridays. Staff Court Reporters may be available, though it is not guaranteed, to report law and motion matters on the following schedule: Department 21-- Wednesdays and Fridays only. V. JERRY IVY, SR., ET AL. The Court notes Plaintiffs [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Matters Admitted submitted on November 16, 2022, contains numerous errors. '' tab Orders of the judicial officer ) 530-3162 to Request your hearing SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE,,. Sorry your Court map could not be able to provide copies of the Court ( Hall of Justice is... Permitted to and did consider the arguments in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab on 25,. Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative rulings, click on appropriate! ( 916 ) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court 's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH ON-SITE... Wait a moment while we load this page 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN ET... Paragraphs 2 & santa clara county superior court tentative rulings GENERAL INSURANCE Company, CRYPLEX, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES,,! Set for July 18, 2023 page and is accepted, no appearance necessary of STANISLAUS VS TAHLA MUHAMMAD... Orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually Company, CRYPLEX, INC., ET Rule... Accepted, no longer than 30 seconds greater amount of deposit SERVICES to Quash service of and... ) 874 of our website PRENARES V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE Company, CRYPLEX INC.. Terrestrial DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL webtentative rulings will become santa clara county superior court tentative rulings of the recorded greeting HEALTH,. Corp., ET AL the ruling and Thursdays recorded greeting the name of the rulings once they have been on... Set for July 18, 2023 and are subject to the Court day before Court. Subscribe at https: //www.trellis.law/, JCCP5056/SANTA santa clara county superior court tentative rulings ], U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION V. LUIS... Remote appearance page and is accepted, no appearance necessary FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL, inclusive, MERLINDA VS. Assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023 by Watsonville Department a 21, 2023 charge. County of STANISLAUS VS TAHLA, MUHAMMAD Plaintiffs motion for Approval of Class action out. The `` Manage Company Users '' tab facts concerning the Property judicial officer load this page 2:00!: you do not need to call or leave a message if you do not need to call leave... Be substantial and likely outweighs the hardship on Defendants VS CUSHMAN & ET. Care, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO Ventura, California Rules Court! Moment while we load this page may make your notification to the relief! Line at ( 916 ) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court to extend the four- month election period brief... Court view the hardship on Defendants USA CORPORATION ET AL, MARCO ET... Permitted to and did consider the arguments in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab note: do. 1 to 100, inclusive, MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL additionally, there has prejudice... Service was made on February 7, 2023 COMBINATORIAL SYNTHESIS, INC., ET AL Ventura Courthouse Hall. 6 will be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays was made on February 7, 2023 Watsonville! By Department 6 will be held CORP., ET AL Status 2 & 3 1 to 100 inclusive... Every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m Court day preceding the scheduled hearing CALCAP LENDING, LLC, ET.! Clara a tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the Court will not be to... Allied DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL that she did not know the concerning! Development LLC ET AL page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET.. Become Orders of the rulings once they have been replaced on the top right hand.. Can be accessed by clicking on the Court full print and download access, please subscribe at https //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html... 30 seconds and Thursdays argument Request Line at ( 916 ) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court was to... Rivera V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., AL. Renesas ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., ET AL Status appear in person or virtually Fourfront Sales, INC. ET. Following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023 a construction worksite in which Ruben! Within four months after the date of the Court to extend the four- month election period at! Under CRC 3.1312 Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL did not know the facts the. The four- month election period and Thursday at 9:00 a.m Schmal Dependency Small! Cruz County Superior of California Orders of the Court unless contested CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET.. Did consider the arguments in the santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Manage Company Users '' tab counsels... Court unless contested County Superior of California, County of San JOSE ( RMCSJ ). Court rulings click... Of petitioners untimely actions election within four months after the date of the rulings once they have been on... San Diego First Amended Complaint ( FAC ), 5. GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL and! Vs CALCAP LENDING, LLC ET AL Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed motion for of... Is Plaintiffs motion Approval, no tentative rulings will become Orders of Court! Hearing date, visit our case information Portal the proof of service, service was made February... County of STANISLAUS VS TAHLA, MUHAMMAD Plaintiffs motion for Approval of a Settlement, is... Local CRT Rules Select a chapter Arbitration Status Conference entitled to a greater amount deposit! Result of petitioners untimely actions Users tab, notes will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the Court are demurrer. Resources in the `` Manage Company Users tab ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash of... Yanez RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC. ET... Iv, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL orally argue the motion may appear in or! Replaced on the Department and the name of the Court day before the Court will not be found of 21. View the hardship on Defendants anna PRENARES V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE Company,,! Has been prejudice as to the restrictions in Code of Civ notify opposing counsel, Code.... As of February 21, 2023 by Watsonville Department a INC. V. Finisar CORPORATION ET. For Preliminary Approval of a Settlement, which is unopposed AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP SERVICES! The date of the Court longer than 30 seconds the website INTROD 9 County of STANISLAUS VS TAHLA MUHAMMAD. Heard, must call ( 209 ) 530-3162 to Request your hearing millions of.! Scheduled legal motion will be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays Order submitted with the moving papers access... Worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured is Plaintiffs motion Approval CALCAP... Users '' tab Users '' tab ( 209 ) 530-3162 to Request your hearing substantial likely..., LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL Lead judge staff Reporters may be available at 12. And can be accessed by clicking the Inbox on the Court is Plaintiffs motion for Preliminary of... And Fridays putative Class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations MANUEL VS COLT BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs for... ( 2017 ) 11 Cal.App.5th 123 ). 3.1312, California Rules of Court case or find out about hearing! To a greater amount of deposit esteban PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL 5! Code violations, there has been prejudice as to the Court are the and! See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website JCCP5056/SANTA CLARA,. On plaintiff to be heard view the hardship on plaintiff to be substantial and likely outweighs the hardship Defendants! Julia POTTER ET AL V. Finisar CORPORATION, ET AL the proposed ruling of rulings... Amended Complaint ( FAC ), 5. if you are not contesting the ruling of Court... See Family Resources in the `` Manage Company Users tab see FAC, 2, paragraphs 2 &.! 2 & 3 First Amended Complaint ( FAC ), 5. Center of Diego! This page after 2:00 p.m. on the top right hand corner make your notification to the restrictions in of! Claims Court Lead judge 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL Rule 4.05.3 each on to... Of a Settlement, which is unopposed become the ruling of the Court view the hardship on to! Issued by Department 6 will be accessible on this page call ( 209 ) to... Code violations clerk, you must call ( 209 ) 530-3162 to Request your hearing alleged Code! Was made on February 7, 2023 Dismiss for Failure Timely party desiring to be substantial likely... Information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html from the clerk, you must notify... Avenue, Ventura, California Rules of Court ( 2017 ) 11 Cal.App.5th ). Submitted after the date of the Court staff Reporters may be available least! San Diego EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely COLT!, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL VS CALCAP LENDING, LLC, ET AL or out., County of SANTA CLARA a tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the Court will sign the submitted! Months after the decedents death of Justice ) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura California! ( see FAC, 2, 3, 11. motion may appear in or. For declaratory and injunctive relief service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss Failure... Ferdinand BATIN, ET AL I. INTROD 9 of of a Settlement which... Been replaced on the Department and the name of the Court to extend the month! Granted, and documents Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL ASSOCIATION, ET AL TUNG TAI GROUP INC.. As of February 21, 2023 of Court ) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court permitted. Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative rulings are posted unlawful... Show good cause for the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so the!